32
Shown below is a summary of the confirmatory data.
Ten subjects were enrolled in a prospective study using
a within-subjects repeated-measures design where each
subject served as his/her own control. Five subjects used
the M Acoustic Earhook, while the remaining 5 used
the M T-Mic and electrical stimulation only. The data
presented below are pooled between the two cohorts.
Sentences in Quiet at 65 dBA
Across all subjects, similar sentence recognition scores
in quiet were observed between AutoSense OS and the
AutoSense OS Off program. See the table below.
2 l
iSt
a
uto
S
eNSe
oS
a
Verage
S
Core
(%)
2 l
iSt
a
uto
S
eNSe
oS o
ff
a
Verage
S
Core
(%)
N
10
10
Mean (SD) 88.92 (11.068)
89.76 (11.677)
Median
94.65
92.88
Min, Max
63.2, 96.7
61.2, 99.3
Sentences in Noise at 65 dBA, + 5 dB SNR Multi-
Talker Babble
Across all subjects, better sentence recognition scores
in noise were observed when using AutoSense OS as
compared to the AutoSense OS Off program. See table
below.
Summary of Contents for CI-5294
Page 1: ...Na da CI M30 Sound Processor CI 5294 instructions for use English Fran ais Espa ol...
Page 2: ......
Page 171: ......
