IA-32 Intel® Architecture Optimization
B-12
•
IOQ_allocation, IOQ_active_entries: 64 bytes for hits or misses,
smaller for partials' hits or misses
Writebacks (dirty evictions)
•
BSQ_cache_reference: 64 bytes
•
BSQ_allocation: 64 bytes
•
BSQ_active_entries: 64 bytes
•
IOQ_allocation, IOQ_active_entries: 64 bytes
The count of IOQ allocations may exceed the count of corresponding
BSQ allocations on current implementations for several reasons,
including:
•
Partials
:
In the FSB IOQ, any transaction smaller than 64 bytes is broken up
into one to eight partials, each being counted separately as a or one
to eight-byte chunks. In the BSQ, allocations of partials get a count
of one. Future implementations will count each partial individually.
•
Different transaction sizes
:
The allocations of non-partial programmatic load requests get a
count of one per 128 bytes in the BSQ on current implementations,
and a count of one per 64 bytes in the FSB IOQ. The allocations of
RFOs get a count of 1 per 64 bytes for earlier processors and for the
FSB IOQ (This granularity may change in future implementations).
•
Retries
:
If the chipset requests a retry, the FSB IOQ allocations get one count
per retry.
There are two noteworthy cases where there may be BSQ allocations
without FSB IOQ allocations. The first is UC reads and writes to the
local XAPIC registers. Second, if a cache line is evicted from the
2nd-level cache but it hits in the on-die 3rd-level cache, then a BSQ
entry is allocated but no FSB transaction is necessary, and there will be
no allocation in the FSB IOQ. The difference in the number of write
Summary of Contents for ARCHITECTURE IA-32
Page 1: ...IA 32 Intel Architecture Optimization Reference Manual Order Number 248966 013US April 2006...
Page 220: ...IA 32 Intel Architecture Optimization 3 40...
Page 434: ...IA 32 Intel Architecture Optimization 9 20...
Page 514: ...IA 32 Intel Architecture Optimization B 60...
Page 536: ...IA 32 Intel Architecture Optimization C 22...