Power Network Application Trainer
– Earthing / Grounding network impedance measurement
119
automatically eliminates neighbourhood connected pylons or parallel connected
earthing systems.
Setup:
– earthing type changed to inductive one
Expected result:
Inductive part of resistance has significant influence, compared only to the resistive
earth type.
Result comparison:
Table 39-2: Result comparison: test object setup vs measurement method
Since transmission pylons are connected via ground wire connection, the HF 25kHz
method is most appropriate one, since it automatically exclude the impedance od
adjacent towers due to high measurement frequency. Ground wire inductance cause,
that impedance of adjacent towers became negligible and only small test current flows
through ground wire connection. Comparing HF measuring method with others we can
conclude, that results measured with 4-pole and S-flex method are smaller, due to the
influence of parallel connected adjacent towers.
Summary of Contents for MI 3298
Page 55: ...Power Network Application Trainer Earthing Grounding network impedance measurement 55 ...
Page 56: ...Power Network Application Trainer Earthing Grounding network impedance measurement 56 ...
Page 124: ...Power Network Application Trainer Earthing Grounding network impedance measurement 124 ...
Page 228: ...MI 3290 Earth Analyser 228 ...
Page 229: ...MI 3280 Digital Transformer Analyser 229 ...
Page 230: ...MI 3280 Digital Transformer Analyser 230 ...
Page 231: ...MI 3250 MicroOhm 10A 231 ...
Page 232: ...MI 3205 TeraOhmXA 5kV 232 ...