D-5
Authentication
Direction
Mutual: Uses digital
certificates both
ways
Mutual: Certificate
for server
authentication, and
tunneled method for
client
Mutual: Certificate
for server, and
protected EAP
method for client
Protection of User
Identity Exchange
No
Yes; protected by TLS Yes; protected by TLS
a.
TLS is secure, but the requirement for client certificates is too big a hurdle for most institutions to
deal with.
b.
TTLS, at least initially, is much more widely implemented than PEAP, and therefore has a slight
convenience advantage over the comparable PEAP method.
c.
PEAP uses the TLS channel to protect a second EAP exchange. PEAP is backed by Microsoft.
Table D-1. Detailed Comparison of TLS-based EAP Methods (continued)
EAP Type
TLS
(RFC 2716)
a
TTLS
(Internet draft)
b
PEAP
(Internet draft)
c
Summary of Contents for CB3000 - Client Bridge - Wireless Access Point
Page 1: ...M CB3000 Client Bridge User s Guide ...
Page 24: ...2 12 CB3000 Client Bridge User s Guide ...
Page 65: ...Management Options 4 7 Figure 4 4 View Log Screen ...
Page 74: ...4 16 CB3000 Client Bridge User s Guide ...
Page 90: ...5 16 CB3000 Client Bridge User s Guide ...
Page 94: ...B 2 CB3000 Client Bridge User s Guide ...
Page 96: ...C 2 CB3000 Client Bridge User s Guide ...
Page 104: ...D 8 CB3000 Client Bridge User s Guide ...
Page 105: ......