Final
Report № AIFN/0010/2018, issued on 10 January 2022
29
A number of factors probably affected the controller as to why he did not visually watch
ABY111:
The controller assumed that ABY111 flight crew read back of take-off clearance
from runway 30 was based on action concurrent to that read back.
The controller assumed that the flight crew are fully aware of the airport layout and
intersection takeoffs as OMSJ is the base of the Operator.
The controller was unaware that the flight crew had planned a rolling takeoff.
The controller had a level of confidence that the flight crew were aware that runway
30 would have required a left turn from Bravo 14 intersection and would not have
considered any possibility that the flight crew might have runway confusion.
The Investigation concludes that the controll
er’s visual watching responsibility after giving
take-off clearance was most likely affected by his confirmation bias of the aforementioned
assumptions.
After this Incident, SANS had implemented the necessary safety actions to alleviate the
issues surrounding controllers' scanning effectiveness.