background image

I

n the past few months we’ve seen a
revolution in the video projection
business. A revolution no one ex-

pected. The prices of home theater front
projectors have been dropping nearly as
fast as flat panel displays. 

Since the September 2006 CEDIA

Expo we’ve seen the introduction of at
least six 1080p projectors priced at or
below $6,500. We’ve already reviewed
three of them (the Sony VPL-
VW50”Pearl,”, the Optoma HD81, and
the Mitsubishi HC5000. A fourth, the
JVC DLA-HD1, was the subject of a
Short Take a few weeks back. While the
JVC is the most expensive of all of these
models, in many respects it’s also the
most exciting. This is the full review.

At $6,300 (a replacement lamp is

priced at $399), the DLA-HD1 is one of
two new projectors from JVC. The other
is the RS1. According to the company,
they differ in only two ways. The RS1 is
sold through JVC’s professional channels,
and the HD1 is sold through consumer
outlets. In addition, the HD1 is black and
silver (see photo) and the RD1 is all
black. But with respect to features, per-
formance, and price, the projectors are
identical.

Technology and Features

LCoS, or Liquid Crystal on Silicon, is

a variation of LCD technology. Sony uses
a variant of LCoS that it calls SXRD,
while JVC uses the moniker D-ILA for
its LCoS designs. Most LCD devices are

transmissive. That is, the light passes
through the imaging chips and emerges
from the other side, modified as required
by the image to be displayed. This has ad-
vantages—LCD can be used in either flat
panel displays with a backlight or in front
or rear projection applications using a
miniaturized imaging chip and a lamp as
a light source. But LCD also has disad-
vantages. A major downside is increased
spacing between the pixels, a require-
ment to accommodate the near-micro-
scopic wiring needed to pass signals to
those imaging elements. This spacing can
result in the”screen door effect,” which
at its worst can look exactly as that name
implies as the pixel structure becomes
visible on screen, though practically
speaking this is less of a problem today
than it was when panel resolutions were
lower.

In an LCoS design the light source

passes through a much thinner LCD
layer, is reflected, passes back through the
LCD layer, and emerges on the same side
from which it entered. The circuitry to
drive the pixels can therefore be located
behind them rather than between them,
so the spacing between pixels can be
much smaller. This narrow pixel spacing
results in a high”fill factor” in an LCoS
display—that is, more of what you see
on-screen is actual picture information
rather than dead space between the pix-
els. One disadvantage to LCoS is that it
is suitable only for projection applica-
tions, not for flat panels.

Until recently, LCoS was behind DLP

in some aspects of its performance and in
price. DLP has made huge gains in recent
years in improved black levels and in-
creased contrast ratios. And DLP projec-

Tom Norton’s 

Favorite under

$10k. 

Way under

$10k!

ultimate

AV

Electronically reprinted from March 2007

JVC DLA-HD1 1920x1080 Home Theater Projector

Thomas J. Norton

Summary of Contents for DLA-HD1

Page 1: ...layed This has ad vantages LCD can be used in either flat panel displays with a backlight or in front or rear projection applications using a miniaturized imaging chip and a lamp as a light source But LCD also has disad vantages A major downside is increased spacing between the pixels a require ment to accommodate the near micro scopic wiring needed to pass signals to those imaging elements This s...

Page 2: ... controls are located on the top of the case but every control you ll need is also available on JVC s well de signed remote The remote offers direct input selection and direct access to a number of frequently used functions in cluding Brightness Contrast Color Sharpness and six different Image Pro files Cinema Natural Dynamic and User 1 2 and 3 While the video adjust ments are global across all in...

Page 3: ...ording to JVC it quadruples the frame rate to 96fps The HD1 s Gennum GF9351 scaling dein terlacing chip doubles the 24fps input to 48fps the 48fps to 96fps step is added elsewhere in the projector s video pro cessing downstream of the Gennum This eliminates the need for 3 2 pull down with 1080p 24 sources The only consumer sources of 1080p 24 material at present are the out puts of a few not all B...

Page 4: ...image partic ularly on good high defini tion material offers plenty of depth and dimensionality The JVC is very quiet in its Normal lamp mode and only slightly louder in High It s not as quiet as the Sony Pearl or Mitsubishi HC5000 but quieter than the Sharp XV Z20000 Its noise is also pitched fairly low making it less intrusive than the usual high fre quency rushing air sound While I didn t use t...

Page 5: ...resolution a bit of edge enhance ment was added The 480i p responses were essentially the same as component With the Mask control off the overscan was zero on all sides in 720p or 1080i HDMI or component In 480i p it ranged between 2 and 3 The JVC s color points were typical of most new digital projectors and short of ideal Red and blue were a little oversaturated green was very oversaturated Whil...

Page 6: ...o on different scenes But at a shade over half the price of the Sharp the deep black and contrast ratio performance of the JVC can only be de scribed as amazing On most program material I also found the JVC to be a hair sharper than the Sharp This was surprising because while both projectors clearly responded to the 37 1MHz video burst on my Ac cuPel test pattern generator tested in HDMI the respo...

Page 7: ... bringing out subtle slightly brighter highlights in most dark scenes This is almost certainly due to the brightness compression in the Sony s dy namic iris When the iris closes down on dark scenes it also chokes off these high lights a bit too not enough to compro mise the picture significantly but enough to limit the way in which those high lights can enhance a scene And third the JVC s image wa...

Reviews: